Phasing out Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae could boost what other borrowers must pay
By Kenneth R. Harney Saturday, February 19,
2011
Fixed 30-year mortgage rates in the 5 percent range? Minimum
down payments below 5 percent? Jumbo-size home loans for high-cost
markets at regular interest rates? Kiss them good-bye - possibly
sooner than you might guess.
Take a snapshot of today's mortgage market conditions and frame
it, because it's highly likely you'll never see anything like these
favorable combinations of rates and terms again. That's the
inescapable conclusion emerging from the Obama administration's
"white paper" on optional remedies for the two ailing giants of
housing finance, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with events
already underway in the national economy.
The administration's long-delayed housing report, released Feb.
11, drew a mix of catcalls and mild applause. Apartment developers
praised the report's emphasis on expanding opportunities for people
to rent their housing as opposed to the idea that homeownership is
for everybody.
Big banks and their allies in Congress welcomed the prospect
that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who together account for about 60
percent of the mortgage market but have cost taxpayers a net $150
billion in bailout money in the past three years, will be heading
into oblivion.
Consumer and real estate industry groups lamented the phaseout
of Fannie and Freddie, which supplied steady streams of mortgage
money for decades despite their recent crashes.
The report offers not only options for Congress to consider in
winding down the two companies but also recommendations on more
immediate "transition" measures to achieve a smaller federal
footprint in the mortgage market. Some of these transitional steps
require no congressional approval and therefore are likely to
affect borrowers and homebuyers in the months ahead. Factor these
changes into your timing for any loan application or purchase
you're contemplating this year:
Higher insurance fees on FHA
mortgages - another quarter of a percentage point on annual
premiums. That's vitally important to people with moderate incomes
and assets, especially in the African American and Hispanic
communities, where FHA loans are the dominant route to
homeownership. The report also hints at a possible increase in
minimum down payments for FHA, currently just 3.5 percent, but
provides no specifics. Any change would require congressional
approval.
Significant reductions in maximum
loan amounts later this year for FHA and conventional loans
eligible for purchase by Fannie or Freddie, unless Congress votes
to retain the current statutory $729,750 limit for high-cost areas
before it expires Oct. 1. Loans above each local market's limit -
whatever the reduced ceiling turns out to be - will be considered
jumbos and come with higher interest rates from private
lenders.
Raising the fees Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac charge lenders to guarantee pools of their mortgages
for resale to bond investors. Lenders will automatically pass those
on to borrowers as a cost of doing business. The report also calls
for raising down-payment requirements at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
to 10 percent.
Retaining the controversial and
costly add-on fees now charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that
can increase the expense of obtaining even a moderate-size mortgage
by thousands of dollars.
These add-ons now extend to applicants with FICO credit scores
of 800 and above who are making substantial down payments. The
white paper actually applauded the imposition of these fees,
calling them one of several "first steps" on the path to weaning
consumers off reliance on Fannie and Freddie for mortgage
money.
The administration wants to not only wind down the two companies
over the coming several years but also severely reduce the size of
FHA's role, cutting its market share from about 30 percent to as
low as 10 percent. Where will the buyers who depend upon FHA today
for affordable financing turn when that sharp cut has been
accomplished? That's not clear.
The white paper makes an oblique reference to a major issue
bubbling on the back burner that could also push rates up:
Regulators are debating what should and shouldn't be a "qualified
residential mortgage" under the terms of last year's financial
reform legislation. Loans that are not "qualified," in terms of
down payment size and other criteria, will require extra
investments by lenders when they pool them into bonds. That could
raise rates for nonqualified mortgages by as much as three
percentage points.
Among the proposals: Make 20 percent to 30 percent down payments
the minimum to meet the "qualified" test.
The worst-case scenario: If you only have enough money for a
small down payment, you'll be charged significantly higher
rates.
Bottom line: Get ready to pay more for mortgages, no matter what
ultimately happens to Fannie and Freddie.